Sunday, 5 October 2014

John Colclough of Ballyteigue


Perhaps of interest...
Rebellion wise, how a family spread itself over both sides of a conflict, firstly my namesake and his unfortunate end...
 
 
Sourced: The United Irishmen, their lives and times – Richard Robert Madden pp 505-513.
 
J. Madden & Co., Leadenhall-Street., 1843
 


MEMOIR OF JOHN COLCLOUGH OF BALLYTEIGUE.

 Taylor truly describes Mr. Colclough as a gentleman of respectability, and one who bore a very excellent private character. He was a relative of Sir Vesey Colclough, who had represented Wexford and Enniscorthy in four successive parliaments. "He was in his stature of a full middle size, had rather a long visage, wore his own hair, which was tied behind. He was about thirty years of age, of a cheerful aspect and polished manners. Mr. Colclough was also executed on the 28th of June."  When Colclough and his lady, along with Bagenal Harvey, were brought into Wexford after their capture, the latter appeared pale and dejected ; but "Mr. Colclough's fortitude," says Taylor, " did not apparently forsake him until he approached the gaol, where he beheld his friend Keogh's head on a spike. On inquiring whose head it was, and hearing it was Keogh's, he seemed like a man electrified, and sank into all the anguish of despair and guilt, and never recovered any show of spirits." The only charge brought against him was, that he had been seen in the rebel forces at the battle of Ross. He admitted having been compelled to attend the general-in-chief to that place; but he proved that, at an early period of the day, he had taken the first opportunity afforded him of quitting the insurgent force, and returning to Wexford. The defence was of no avail; his death, like that of Grogan and Harvey, had been previously determined. John Henry Colclough left a widow and an infant child. His property was not large, and, being chiefly leasehold, no attainder was issued. His widow married a Mr. Young, a magistrate of the county, the late occupier of Ballyteigue. It is stated by Sir Richard Musgrave that, a short time before his execution, he directed his son to be brought up in the Protestant religion: no such direction was ever given by Mr. Colclough. The circumstance of his being unattended at the place of execution by a clergyman of the church to which he belonged, was taken by Sir Richard Musgrave as an evidence of his conviction of "the errors of Romanism," and a probable reason for his alleged desire to have his child brought up in another religion. The fact is that Colclough, up to the last moment, expected a respite, from his intimacy with some of the officers of the army then at Wexford, whose interference in his behalf he relied on. This expectation prevented him from calling to his assistance a Roman Catholic clergyman; he thought if he had done so it would operate against him. It is only to be lamented that any consideration should have so far weighed with one in his awful circumstances, as to deprive him of that spiritual assistance which he stood in need of at his last moments. One of the Wexford loyalists of the name of Jackson, who was charged with being an Orangeman, and condemned to suffer death, while the rebels were in possession of Wexford, gives the following account of Colclough's execution : " 27th June, 1798. — Before I went on board the vessel I saw Mr. Colclough, who had been tried and convicted, brought by himself to the place of execution, at the bridge, between five and six o'clock this evening. As soon as he came to the foot of the gallows, he addressed the spectators with a firm, distinct voice, and without the least change of countenance, nearly as follows: ' Gentlemen, I am now come to that time which is the most awful that man can experience. Thank God, I am not afraid to die! I can smile at the gallows and at the rope with which I am to be executed! I wish to feel if it be strong enough. [He took hold of the rope and proceeded.] I shall thank you, gentlemen, for a little water, as I desire to drink a toast before I die. [Some water was immediately brought him, and he took the mug in his hand.] Here' said he, ' is success to the king and constitution, and I hope my fate will be a warning to all mankind not to attempt to interfere with the order of government, or to disturb the peace of their country. As I shall answer it to God, before whom I must shortly appear [here he laid his hand upon his breast], I declare that I did not know of the rebellion breaking out till within three hours of the time when arms were taken up. But I acknowledge the justice of my sentence, for about three years ago I was one of the principal abettors in this business. I have now, gentlemen, only one favour to ask of you, which is, that you will not take off my coat and waistcoat, as I have only an old, borrowed shirt under them, and I wish to appear decently before the people.' All the other criminals, it should be observed, had been stripped to their shirts before their execution. "He then knelt down and prayed a few minutes, after which he was drawn up, and I quitted the spot while he was suspended. " The persons whom I have already mentioned, and two others, were all that were executed while I remained in Wexford. Messrs. Harvey, Keoghe, Grogan, and Colclough were Protestants. Mr. Colclough was of a very respectable family, and possessed considerable property in the county of Wexford, and was very much esteemed by all who knew him, as a worthy and ingenuous man." Charles Jackson, in his narrative of transactions in the Wexford rebellion, has the following reference to the trials and executions on the 27th and 28th of June : " Wednesday, 27th June. — The adjourned trial of Mr. Grogan recommenced, and lasted four hours (in the whole nine hours), when he was found guilty…" A party, consisting of a sergeant's guard belonging to the 29th regiment, was now ordered to march to the quay to receive Mr. Harvey and Mr. Colclough, who had been taken prisoners in the Saltee Islands; and about three o'clock this afternoon they arrived. Great numbers of officers belonging to the different corps now in the town had assembled on the quay to see men who had become so notorious. "On their landing, Mr. Harvey appeared to be very much dejected, and scarcely spoke to anyone. Mr. Colclough, on the contrary, seemed to be in very good spirits. On hearing many persons inquiring which was Mr. Harvey and which Mr. Colclough, he pulled off his hat, and bowing in the most polite manner, said, ' Gentlemen, my name is Colclough.' They were then both taken to the gaol. "Some of the soldiers who had been of the party sent to the Saltee Islands to apprehend Mr. Harvey and Mr. Colclough, informed me, that when they came to the island they found but one house upon it, in which lived an old man and family ; that upon their landing they heard somebody holloa, as if to give warning to others ; and they then saw the old man run across a field into his house. The soldiers followed him, and endeavoured by every entreaty to prevail upon him to discover to them the place where the fugitives were concealed, but without effect. Finding they could get no intelligence by this mode of address, and having certain information that the persons they sought for were there, they tied him up, and gave him two dozen lashes, when he acknowledged that Mr. Colclough and Mr. Harvey were in a cave in a rock close to the sea. He then conducted them to the other side of the island, where they found the cave; but it was so situated that it was impossible to approach the fugitives without a deal of trouble and danger. It was then thought most prudent to call to Mr. Harvey, who making no answer, the commander of the party told those within that resistance was vain, that he had a large body of men with him, and should immediately order them to fire into the cave if those who were concealed there did not come out. On this Mr. Colclough appeared, and he and Mr. Harvey surrendered themselves. "The soldiers were of opinion that if he had defended himself, by firing through the chinks of the rock, he might have killed several of them before they could possibly have shot at him with any effect. When he was taken, he had an old musket, a pocket pistol, and two cutlasses. Colclough's wife was with him. There was a very neat feather-bed, blankets, and sheets, in the cave, and a keg of whiskey ; also a jar of wine, a tub of butter, and some biscuits ; a large pound-cake that weighed above twenty pounds, a live sheep, and a crock of pickled pork ; also tea, sugar, &c. The two chests of plate were also found near the cave; these were brought in a boat to town, and placed under the care of a magistrate. Mrs. Colclough was not brought to Wexford with her husband and Mr. Harvey. "In the evening the trial of Mr. Harvey commenced, and notwithstanding the notoriety of his guilt, such was the candour and forbearance of the court-martial that his trial lasted eight hours, when he was found guilty Mr. Colclough's trial and execution followed. " Mr. Colclough was in stature of a full, middlesize ; but rather of a long visage. He wore his own hair, which was of a sandy colour, and tied behind. He was about thirty years of age, of a cheerful aspect, and of pleasant manners." Gordon states that "Harvey and Grogan were executed together on the 28th of June ; Colclough, alone, in the evening of the same day." Hay states that Grogan and Harvey and a Mr. Pendergast, a rich malster of Wexford, were executed on the 27th of June; and that Colclough was tried the same day and executed the day after, the 28th of June. I discovered the tomb of John Henry Colclough in the old burial-ground of the church in Wexford (no longer existing) that was called St. Patrick's Church, after many fruitless inquiries, strange to say, of all the persons in the town who might have been expected to know where the remains of their judicially-murdered townsmen were buried. The following is the inscription on his tomb : Here lieth the body of John Henry Colclough, Of Ballyteigue, who departed this life The 27th of June, 1798, In his 29th year. In the same place of burial there is a tomb with the following inscription — perhaps in memory of one of the family of Bagenal Beauchamp Harvey: Captain Pierce Harvey, died The 23rd of October, 1816, Aged 87 years. There is also in this churchyard a monument " To the memory of the North Cork militia officers killed at Oulart." To the honour of the medical profession be it said, very few of its members were unfaithful to the interests of humanity, or forgetful of the duties imposed on them by their calling. I wish I could say as much for the members of two other professions. A wretch of the name of Waddy, a physician of Wexford, was an exception to the rule that applies to the medical profession. He crawled out of the place of concealment in which he skulked, when Wexford was delivered from the rebels and fell into the hands of the king's troops, and volunteered to set out on an expedition to the Saltee Islands, in search of two fugitive gentlemen with whom he had been long previously on terms of intimacy — Messrs. Col-clough and Bagenal Beauchamp Harvey. The base man, having abandoned his professional duties for the pursuit of a man-hunter, set out, no doubt furnished with private information obtained by treachery. He was a keen ascendancy sportsman; the scent of rebel blood was a trail not to be misled by the medical man -hound of Wexford. He set his prey, secured it, and bagged the blood- money that was offered for it. Like the gallant Captain John Warneford Armstrong, after he had consigned his two friends and dupes to death, Dr. Waddy was feasted, eulogized, and extolled. Gentlemen spoke of him on the magisterial bench and in the grand jury room as a virtuous citizen of great energy of character. Dr. Waddy's honours and laudations could not fail to be highly gratifying, for the time being, at the hands of the Orange potentates of Wexford, just recovering from their recent panic, and that worst kind of fear, the poltroonery of fanaticism, inciting to acts base, bloody, and brutal. The good service done by the discovery and capture of his old acquaintance, Bagenal Harvey, and the young gentleman, John Colclough, whose family he only knew in his medical capacity, was deemed worthy of civic honours and after-dinner orations in the company of half-drunken Orange loyalists- But a year and a-half had not passed over before the doctor's peace of mind was disturbed, not by remorse, perhaps, but by constant dread, and perturbation of spirits, rather exacerbated than relieved by recourse to stimulants, which at times produced excitement that amounted to a state of disordered intellect. In one of those fits of temporary insanity so induced, an unfortunate friar lost his life at the doctor's hands, attempting to escape, as Waddy alleged, after an attempt to murder him. But as dead friars tell no tales, the monk's version of this tragical occurrence is not on record, in this world. The following version of it is the mundane one of the northern organs of Orangeism of the time, taken from a Dublin communication, dated 28th December, 1799: " An occurrence of a very extraordinary kind took place a few days since in the county of Wexford, at Clougheast, the seat of Dr. Richard Waddy. Dr. Waddy having rendered himself very obnoxious to the rebels by his active loyalty during the rebellion, particularly by having been principally concerned in the apprehension of Bagenal Harvey, found it necessary, for the safety of his life, to reside in the old vaulted castle of Clougheast, where the entrance of his bed-chamber was secured by an antique portcullis. Thus fortified, Dr. Waddy had hitherto defied all threats of assassination which came against him from every side.  A few days ago, a mendicant Popish friar of Taghmon, named Burn, visited the doctor at his castle, and was hospitably entertained at dinner. Burn begged to be allowed to remain, and, after some difficulty on the part of his host, was permitted to lie in a second bed in the vaulted chamber. While the doctor and the friar were going to their beds, the friar expressed great anxiety that his host should say his prayers, a duty which the doctor, who drank freely, seemed disposed to neglect. In the middle of the night, Dr. Waddy heard somebody drawing his cavalry sword, which hung at his bed's head, and immediately after was attacked by the friar, who had arisen from his bed, dressed himself, and was now endeavouring to murder his host. The latter received several wounds on the head and arm, and at length the friar, supposing he had accomplished his purpose, attempted to escape under the portcullis. Dr. Waddy had just strength enough left to loose the cord which supported it, and it fell on the priest with such violence as almost to sever his body, which fell down lifeless into the apartment below. The next morning the body of the friar was found, and the servants coming into their master's room, found him covered with his own blood. Immediately medical aid was had, and we have the satisfaction of learning that Dr. Waddy is out of danger. A coroner's inquest was held on the body of Burn, and the jury (composed of the Roman Catholic inhabitants of the neighbourhood) found a verdict of accidental death." A kinsman of John Henry Colclough, Mr. John Colclough of Tintern Abbey, was the nephew of Mr. Cornelius Grogan, and in 1798 was at the head of the family interest, which was very considerable, in the county of Wexford. Before the outbreak of the insurrection he and Mr. Thomas McCord, a respectable gentleman of the same county, left Ireland, and had taken up their abode at Haverfordwest, in Pembrokeshire. It was respecting their' residence, perhaps the following notice of a catastrophe in his family may account for Dr. Waddy's terror of assassination. Mr. Samuel Waddy of Jamesville, in the county of Wexford, was murdered in his house, on the night of the 1st of May, 1793, by a man of the name of Spain, who had been recently discharged from his service. For particulars see Exshaw's Magazine, May, 1793. hence there that a remarkable correspondence took place, which I now refer to. The Duke of Portland addressed the following letter to the magistrates at Haverfordwest : " Whitehall, 22nd June, 1798. " Gentlemen — I have received your letter on the subject of the late influx of persons in your county from Ireland, and am extremely sorry to observe that there are so many young clergymen and able-bodied men among them. The conduct of such persons, in remaining out of Ireland at a moment like the present, is very much to be censured; and I desire that you will use your best endeavours to impress them with a due sense of the dangerous tendency of such an example, and of the dishonourable and disgraceful imputations to which it obviously exposes them; and, at the same time, that you will make known to the clergy that their names will certainly be reported to their respective diocesans. With respect to Mr. Colclough and Mr. McCord, I desire that they may have full liberty either to go to Ireland or to stay in the country; and that all persons for whom they will answer, as well as all infirm men, women, and children, may be admitted to the same indulgence. “I am, gentlemen, " Your most obedient, humble servant, " Portland. " To Messrs. Jordan and Bowen, at Haverfordwest." When the Wexford gentlemen got information of this correspondence, the Protestant gentlemen of the county were summoned to a general meeting in the town of Wexford, on the 7th of July, 1798, by General Lake. A copy of the duke's letter was laid before them : Dr. Duigenan says they were all struck with amazement, and they determined unanimously to send a letter to the duke on the subject, of which the following is a copy — it was signed by the high sheriff of the county : " The committee of gentlemen of the county of Wexford, appointed by General Lake, having read a copy of a letter from his Grace the Duke of Portland to Messrs. Bowen and Jordan, magistrates in the town of Haverfordwest, South Wales, dated 22nd June ult., .and which appears to have been in answer to a letter received by his grace from those gentlemen, cannot avoid testifying their hearty sorrow at the censure thrown upon the clergy of their dioceses in said letter, and their indignation at the gross misrepresentations which must have occasioned it. They are unanimous in a high opinion of the loyalty, patriotism, and proper conduct of the clergy, and strongly feel the necessity of their flight and absence during the continuance of the rebellion which so unhappily raged in this country; as, had they not effected their escape, they have every reason to conclude that they would have shared a similar fate with those unhappy few of that body who early fell into the hands of the insurgents, and were afterwards massacred in cold blood. " They lament that men of such unblemished character and conduct should, from the secret representations of persons no way qualified, be proscribed that protection and asylum so liberally bestowed on the persons of Mr. John Colclough and Thomas M'Cord, men who were and might have remained in perfect security in his majesty's fort at Duncannon, and whose characters are by no means free from imputation in this country, and on whom they are sorry to find such favour lavished by the English cabinet ; as they are certain no favourable account of their conduct could be made to government, save by themselves. " Edward Percivall, "Sheriff, and Chairman of the Committee." "Wexford, 7th July, 1798." "To His Grace the Duke of Portland, Whitehall." To this letter his grace never condescended to return any answer. The following paragraph was inserted in the Waterford newspaper of the 10th July, 1798 : " Yesterday, Mr. John Colclough of Tintern Castle, county of Wexford, was brought here from Milford, in custody of two king's messengers ; he was escorted by a party of the Union cavalry to Thomastown, on his way to Dublin. Mr. McCord, who was implicated in the charge for which the former was apprehended, had made off ; but it is said that there was no probability of his avoid ing the vigilance of his pursuers. These are the two gentlemen who were spoken so favourably of in a letter from the Duke of Portland to Messrs. Jordan and Bowen, of Haverfordwest. "Clericus Wexfordiensis."

Monday, 25 August 2014

Some more


http://www.colclough-family.com/
if the link doesn't work try right click and cut and paste, I will try and maintain a family name database there, it might load slowly but persevere and I will try to make it less cumbersome

Above because I am going to try to move away from this Google based format

Also below... because I'm not sure if it is going to work yet

Some pre-Ireland Colclough information

 

 

COLCLOUGH, William (d.c.1414), of Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffs. and Calverhall, Salop.



Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1386-1421, ed. J.S. Roskell, L. Clark, C. Rawcliffe., 1993
Available from Boydell and Brewer


 
Family and Education

younger son of Richard Colclough† (d. by 1385), of Newcastle-under-Lyme, and brother of John*. m. Elizabeth.1

Offices Held


Escheator, Salop and the adjacent Welsh march, 9 Nov. 1406-30 Nov. 1407.

Biography


Colclough’s first election to Parliament in 1384 undoubtedly owed a great deal both to his father, who had himself sat for Newcastle in 1360, and his elder brother, John, the mayor, with whom he was then returned (and with whom he again represented the borough in January 1390). As a close relative of two of Newcastle’s most distinguished residents and office-holders, he could thus be sure of a seat in the Commons, although his ensuing popularity with the electors may also have been due to the fact that he was a lawyer. In March 1386 he stood surety in Chancery for the parson of the neighbouring village of Wolstanton (where his family owned property), and he again appears as a mainpernor in 1390 and 1391. During the Easter term of 1393 he acted as his brother’s attorney in a lawsuit over the manor of Hanley. Four years later he was summoned to defend himself in an assize of novel disseisin at Stafford, although the action, which was arraigned by a local widow, may well have been collusive. At some point before 1411, Colclough became either the owner or feoffee-to-uses of land in and around Newcastle which was also the subject of litigation.2 We do not know when he went to live in the Shropshire village of Calverhall, but it seems likely that he left Newcastle during the years between his last return to Parliament (January 1397) and his appointment as escheator of Shropshire (November 1406), perhaps as a result of a lucrative marriage. He was dead well before the summer of 1415, when Sir William Newport* sued his executors for a debt of 40s. He left a widow, Elizabeth, who together with his brother, John, was responsible for the administration of his estate.3

Ref Volumes: 1386-1421


Author: C.R.


Notes


The possibility that Colclough represented Newcastle in the Parliament of 1372 (the return records the election of Thomas Colclough, but the writ de expensis refers to William) is very slight, on chronological grounds alone (Staffs. Parl. Hist. i (Wm. Salt Arch. Soc.), 113-14).

       1. Ibid. xvii. 54; JUST 1/1504 m. 101.

       2. CCR, 1385-9, p. 152; 1389-92, p. 509; Wm. Salt Arch. Soc. xv. 24, 55; xvi. 76; JUST 1/1504 m. 101.

       3. Wm. Salt Arch. Soc. xvii. 54. A William Colclough became bailiff of Newcastle in 1406, but since the subject of this biography was then active as escheator of Shropshire, and presumably living in Calverhall, we may assume that one of his many kinsmen held this office (T. Pape, Med. Newcastle-under-Lyme, 172).
 
The William Salt Archive is a fantastic source for east midlands history...
John

Saturday, 2 August 2014

experiment

I wonder if this will work, I've been trying to put together a database of all the names in BHDC's and Bernie's documents,

http://www.colclough-family.com/


if the link doesn't work try cutting and pasting

See if this will work...
John

Saturday, 19 July 2014

Some notes on Duffry... for Alymer and Pamela, it's very hard to find specific information but this is what I have been able to track down, indeed you may already know this

 

http://www.buildingsofireland.ie/cgi-bin/viewsite.cgi?siteid=312

Duffry Hall had been built by Caesar's Colclough’s (b. 1696) grandfather Patrick (a Catholic active Jacobite) in about 1685,  Caesar was the Protestant son of the exiled Dudley, who with the aid of his uncles had succeeded in recovering more than half of his father's sequestrated lands and a great deal more besides.
 In 1663 Patrick had married his second cousin Katherine Bagenal and such of his time as was not devoted to his duties as justice of the peace, High Sheriff of Wexford, Deputy Lieutenant and M.P. for Enniscorthy was taken up with building operations. The Hall, which was beautifully situated on the southern slopes of the Blackstairs mountains was described as the most magnificent seventeenth century building in Co. Wexford.
I cannot find any information on Duffry Lodge but the above Patrick had a son Patrick who it seems was killed by his own gun climbing over a wall at Mohurry (Duffry) deer park, any aspiring family with an estate and a deer park would have had a hunting lodge, and why not Duffry Lodge? If I was to guess I would say it would have been built 1685 or certainly not long thereafter. On the map above there is a lodge noted but it doesn't seem to be called Duffry Lodge, but again if I was to guess that's where it could be.
I hope this is of some use I will keep looking but there is not much mention if Duffry Lodge in the documents I have been able to track down.
John

 

Sunday, 1 June 2014

More on Vesey

A most interesting person...


Post Nuptial Settlement of Vesey Colclough, dated June 1767.
Registered, 7th July, 1767.
 This Indenture made 13th June, 1767 between Vesey Colclough of Tintern Abbey, in the County Wexford Esq., and Catherine Colclough otherwise Grogan, his wife, of the first part; Henrietta Colclough, of the City of Dublin, widow and relict of Caesar Colclough late of Mocorry, in the County of Wexford, aforesaid Esq., deceased of the second part; John Carroll of the City of Dublin Gentleman, of the third part; The Rev. Thomas Colclough of Kilmagee in the County of Kildare, Clerk, of the fourth part; Agmondisham  Vesey, of Lucan in the City of Dublin Esq., and Adam Colclough of Shroughmore in the County of Wexford aforesaid of the 5th part; John Grogan, of Johnstown, in the said Co. of Wexford Esq., and Cornelius Grogan, eldest son and heir apparent of the said John Grogan of the 6th part; and Sir Charles Bingham of Castlebar in the County of Mayo, Bart, and John Jervis Whyte, the elder, of Ballyillis in the said Co. of Wexford Esqr, of the 7th part. Witnesseth that for and in consideration of the marriage already had and solemnised between the said Vesey Colclough, and the said Catherine his wife, and for in consideration of the sum of £4,000,to the said Vesey Colclough in hand, paid on the perfection hereof by the said John Grogan, her father, in full of all and every portion and portions whatsoever, provided or intended for the said Catherine, as one of the younger children of the said John Grogan, by virtue of any article, or settlement whatsoever, or otherwise, the receipt and payment of which said sum of £4000, the said Vesey Colclough doeth hereby acknowledge, and thereof and every part thereof doeth acquit, release, and discharge the said John Grogan, his heirs, executors , administrators and assigns for ever, by these presents. And for settling upon, and making, and providing for the said Henrietta Colclough a competent jointure, and maintenance for her life, in lieu of all and every jointure, and claim and demand  whatsoever, which the said Henrietta hath, or might have or claim against all, or any of the lands, tenements, hereditaments, hereinafter mentioned. And for providing and making a provision for the payment of the debts and incumbrances which now affect the lands, etc., And for providing a competent jointure and provision for the maintenance of the said Catherine Colclough in case she shall survive the said Vesey her husband.  And for settling and assuring the Manor, lands, tenements, and hereditaments hereinafter mentioned, upon such trust, and to and for such intents and purposes and under and subject to such provisions, limitations and agreements, as are hereinafter mentioned, expressed and declared, of and concerning the same. And for and in consideration of the sum of 10/- sterling, to the said Vesey Colclough, in hand paid by the said John Carroll, at or before the ensealing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and for divers other good causes and considerations, him the said Vesey Colclough thereunto moving. And for and in consideration, of the annuity, yearly rent, or sum of £600 sterling hereinafter given and granted to and for the use of the said Henrietta Colclough for her life, in full of all jointure, dower, or thirds which she hath or claims, or might otherwise have or be entitled to, out of all or any of the lands, etc., hereinafter mentioned, by virtue of, or under any other deed, articles, or settlements whatsoever, for or on account of dower, or other demand whatsoever, they the said Vesey Colclough and Henrietta Colclough, have and each of them, according to their respective estates, right, titles, and interest, hath given, granted, bargained, and sold, released and confirmed, by these presents do, and each  of them as aforesaid doeth give, grant, bargain, sell, release and confirm unto the said John Carroll (in his actual possession now being) by virtue of a bargain and sale to him thereof made, by the said Vesey Colclough, by his indenture bearing date, the day next before the day of the date of these presents, in consideration of 5/- for the term of one whole year, and by force of the statute for transferring uses into possession, and to his heirs and assigns. All that and those, the Manor of Tintern, with the appurtenances in the County Wexford, and the scite, circuit, ambite, and prescient of the dissolved Abbey, Monastery or religious House of Tintern, and the town and lands of Tintern,  Castleisell, Castleworkhouse, Newtown, Saltmills, Ballygarret, Cappaclauane, Gibstown, St.Keirins, Garrycullan, Tallaghe, St.Leonards, Ballyhackby, Curraghmore, Miltown, Dunmain, Ballyfleming, Ballytarsney, Garryduff, Booley, Yoaltown, Cheristown, Scartdown otherwise Owenduffe, Tobernassen, Ganestown, Kinnagh, Cooleroe, Ballycullane, Ballingtown, Ballybought, Grange of Kilmore, Castletown, Bannow, Mocorry, Ballyinrock, Coolree, Coolevane, Wheelagour, Coolerin, Kiltealy, Duneen, Knocknemilll, Curraghduff, Tincurry, Ballybrine, Ballynemenanagh, Rossard, Glaslackin, Clonbrien, Keile, Mandoran, Bowlyusk, Keintighe, Tumona, Skahanah, Coolena, Coolacarney, and Ballynecoola, in the County Wexford aforesaid, and also two parks of land, one garden, twenty four Burgages, and the fourth part of a  Burgage lying in St. Johns Street, in or near Wexford aforesaid, and also the fourth of the town and lands of Mangan, in the County of Wexford aforesaid. And one moiety of the town & land of Ballylosky, Shroughmore, Ballynecullagh, and Tomcurry, in the County of Wexford aforesaid, and one third part of the towns and land of Ballytrany, Ballydorrogh, Ballynevocrane, Rylanemore and Rylanebegg, otherwise Rylands, Castlekirk, and Killmeeshil in the County of Wexford, aforesaid and one sixth part of a third part of the said town and lands of Rylands, Castlekirk, and Killmeeshil, aforesaid. And the watercourse and ferry of Bannow in said County, and one yearly rent of £100 sterling issuing out of the town and lands of Moynart, and one chief rent of £40 sterling issuing out of the whole territory of the Duffry in said County, and also one other chief rent of £1 sterling issuing out of St. Johns street in the town of Wexford, and one other yearly rent of £1 sterling, issuing out of the village and lands of Coolbeck, and Ballywilliam otherwise Ballylean, and one other yearly rent of 5/stg issuing out of the rectory church or Chapel of Killay, in said County, and also the Rectories and Churches of Tintern, St.Keiran, St.Leonards, Nashe, Owenduff, Dunmane, Coolemane, Kinnagh, Bannow, and Kilmore in that said County. and also the great and small tithes of Tintern, St.Keirans, St.Leonards, Nashe, Owenduff, Dunmane, Clonmaine, Kineagh, Bannow, and Kilmore, in the said County, and all that and those, the Rectories of the church of St.Molins, and all the tithes great and small issuing, and growing, and renewing out of the town and land of St.Molins, in the County of Catherlagh, together with all and singular the right members, and appurtenances to the said manor, town, lands, tenements, rents, tithes, hereditaments, and premises  belonging or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, yearly and other rents, issues and profits of the said manor, townsland, tenements, rents tythes, hereditaments, and premises herein before mentioned, to be hereby granted and released, and of every of them and of every part and parcel thereof, and of all the estate, right, title, interest, trust, property, profit, claim, challenge, and demand whatsoever, of them the said Vesey and Henrietta Colclough, of in, to, or out of, the manor, towns etc., to have and to hold, all and singular, the said manor, towns etc., unto him the said John Carroll, his heirs and assigns for ever, to such uses, upon each trust, and to and for such intents and purposes, and under and subject to such provisos limitations and agreements as are hereinafter limited, expressed and declared of and concerning the same and to no other use, intent or purpose whatsoever. That is to say, as to certain parts of the lands and estates (named and described) to secure an Annuity of £600 to Henrietta Colclough, for life in favour of Dower, with powers of distress and entry on non payment. And as to the said Manor, and all and singular, other said towns, lands etc., to the use and behoof of the said Vesey Colclough, and his assigns for the term of his life, without impeachment of waste, and with full liberty to commit? waste, (note: this last clause he certainly carried out B.H.C.), and after the death of said Vesey, to the intent that Catherine Colclough should receive an annuity of £500 for her life in bar of Dower . Then to the use of and behoof of Caesar Colclough, only son of said Vesey and Catherine his wife, and the heirs male of his body, and for default of such issue, then to the use and behoof of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and every other the son and sons of the body of the said Vesey, on the body of the said Catherine his wife, to be begotten, severally, successively, and in remainder one after an other, as they and every of them shall be in seniority of age and priority of birth, and of the several and respective heirs male, of the body and bodies, of all and every such son and sons lawfully issuing, the elder of such sons, and the heirs male of his body issuing, being always preferred, and to take before the younger of such son and sons, and the heirs male of his and their body and bodies issuing, and for default of such issue, then to the use and behoof of the said Vesey Colclough, his heirs and assigns for ever. Declarations of trusts, first, to secure said Henrietta and said Catherine in their annuities, then in trust for raising a sum of £3000, for said Vesey, to be at his disposal by any writing under his hand, or by his Will, and also if said trustees thought fit, for raising the further sum of £3000,for said Vesey Colclough, and also out of rents to pay the interest of the incumbrances then affecting the premises, and also the interest of the said sums of £3000, and also, by sale or mortgage, of said premises comprised in said term, to raise money to pay off the several incumbrances, then affecting the premises, Trustees receipts to purchasers to be valid and sufficient, and with a clause of indemnity to trustees, and a power to charge the Estate with a sum not exceeding £10,000, as portion and portions for younger children. Clause conferring a leasing power on said Vesey, with covenant to levy a fine, and suffer a recovery for the uses and purposes aforesaid, with covenant for further assurance. 
 Vesey Colclough.    Catherine Colclough.  Henrietta Colclough.  John Carroll.   Thomas Colclough.     Adam Colclough.    John Grogan. Witnesses present. Alexander Hutcheson, Andrew  Galbraith, Garrett Drake.

Friday, 30 May 2014

a random addition

I do mean to keep going but it could be a full time job, so if there are daily posts you'll know I've finally fully retired, I have managed to get work down to 3 days per week...

Anyway I was looking through some random trawling of the ether I'd done a few year ago and thought this would be of interest, I've lost the link so apologies...

John


1766
29 May Deed of Transfer of Borough of Enniscorthy between Vesey Colclough of Tintern Abbey and Adam eldest surviving son of Caesar Colclough of Duffry Hall dcd. by which Adam surrenders his burgessship to Vesey as also do Rev Thomas Colclough brother of Adam, Richard, also brother, and Caesar eldest son of Adam; and Vesey is put into quiet and peaceable enjoyment of the .Borough of Enniscorthy by Adam for the sum of £3,000. Witnesses included Thomas, Henry & Richard Colclough. By the above deed the Borough was transferred from the Duffry Hall branch of the Colclough family to the Tintern Branch who disposed of it to Lord Lismore and Sir Wm. Gleadows for £13,000 in March 1800 The sale is mentioned in a letter from John Colclough to his brother Caesar dated March 1800. For dealings in pocket boroughs see Lecky, vol. iv. Some account of the Duffry branch of the Colclough family connected for so many years and by so many members of the family, with this town may be acceptable. The extent and bounds of The Duffry do not appear to be precisely known. As far as we can make it out it was an extensive district lying between the Rivers Urrin & Glasha, including most of Monart with parts of Templeshanbo and Killan, and the Northern part of the forest of Killoughrim.. It was bounded in the North by Mount Leinster and in the South probably included the site of the Anglo-Norman town of Enniscorthy, which was the high land on the right bank of the Slaney. It did not pass to the other side as the river was its boundary to the east. Sir Thomas Colclough of Tintern appears to have been the first of the family to acquire land in this district. The following is an extract from some mss of the late Caesar Colclough " The Duffry estate appears to have been acquired partly by private purchase and partly by grant from the crown. In 1603 Sir Thomas purchased several townlands from Sir Geo. Carew, Kt. On 20 March 1627 Sir Dudley (son of Sir Dudley) had a confirmation from the crown of right and title to the Castle, town and lands of Moynart and divers other lands in the Duffrie, all of which had been previously acquired by Sir Thomas, paying to the Crown a yearly rent of 15s and on 15 Dec. 1685 Patrick (son of Sir Dudley) got a grant of about 40 townlands for ever at a. yearly rent of £60.00 (note 40 townlands about 7,800 acres). Whether this comprises the whole of the Dufrrie or only the part held by the Colcloughs or whether it describes all that the Colcloughs possesses in the Duffrie is uncertain. Duffry Hall close to Kiltealy in Templeshanbo Parish is marked on the O.S. map. The Urrin River separates them. Under the heading Irish Life 120 years Ago notices of this place and the Colcloughs who lived there appeared in The People, a local Wexford paper, in July 1899 and December 21 1901. An Evening in the Duffry in the same paper August 16 & 30 1902 and Nov. 28 1903 also describe it. It is stated 'to have been built early in the 17th century for the heir of Tintern to reside there while waiting to succeed to his inheritance. A fine massive mansion with accommodation for a large family beside a great number of guests with their servants and attendants. It could not have been built before 1655 or it would have been shown on the Down Survey map. It may have been built after 1685 when Patrick Colclough got his large land grant. and was probably intended either as dower house for Tintern or as a separate residence for the Mocurry branch of the family.

Friday, 9 May 2014

Another letter

The internet is sporadic to say the least where I am at present but I will try posting this John 30 January 1795. Letter from John Colclough, Dublin, to Caesar Colclough, Lausanne, Switzerland. He expresses relief that the reports that Caesar Colclough has been executed in France were unfounded, and goes on to discuss Enniscorthy borough. ‘...I am happy to find what was done at Enniscorthy pleases you, particularly the appointment of Rock. You may guess I did nothing without the approbation of my mother and all my uncles, though there was one of your burgesses who did not approve of filling up the vacancies at all, to whom I had written (in answer to a most extraordinary letter of his) my reasons, which were unanswerable; and I think, that his own judgment be what it was, he should have admitted to the united wish of my mother, my uncle and myself at a juncture when yours could not possibly be known. But this however he did not think proper and though he would not be at the trouble of attending himself, send his veto by Pat Colclough who, with the most consummate assurance and villainy, proposed the Councillor, who was rejected by a majority of seven. I have deferred mentioning the name of the burgess who sent his veto because I know it will hurt you to find the world so deceitful. It was no other than William Harvey in whom all your friends join me in opinion that you were deceived but I trust will be for no longer-at least it shan’t be my fault if you are. In addition to his extraordinary conduct as above, I must inform you that, though even Portrieve, he never attended but once (as well as I recollect) since you left this kingdom. ...’he adds that Harvey, as well as being a false friend, is an incapable lawyer. ‘... I have been thus elaborate on this subject, lest you might think it extraordinary my employing Waddy to dissolve the custodiums and do some other necessary law business for you, consequent to my father’s death. I had tried him before, and find him exceedingly clever, expeditious, cheap and successful. He is now esteemed one of the first attorneys in Dublin, and though not of the same political interest as us, he does not pretend to be so, and you will find him a much more moderate man than the other. Out of 38 custodiams, he got consents to dissolve 34... William Sutton... you may truely call a friend and you may thank for now having the borough of Enniscorthy, as will you find hereafter. I pay Waddy 50, which went but a little towards dissolving the custodiams, for each of which I should have told you there was 10 shillings a year King’s silver paid off of the estate, which is now done away, beside no rents could be received or anything done till they were all dissolved. I sent two bills, one to Copenhagen, the other to O’Reilly at Basle in Switzerland, for your use, that amounted to £65. The reason I sent so little was because I was certain they would never reach you, and I believe I conjectured right. I paid my mother £100. I sent last Sunday to Stuck(?) Scimon (?) for Morres’s £108. I paid for my father’s funeral (by his dying request I was obliged to bring him to Tintern) and for his debts contracted for the necessaries of life during the four last months of his life (for, having sold his employment, he must have starve) £240, and there are still some unpaid. This is only a rough sketch. The items are too many to be contained in a letter, But, however, when you come over, you can see this account along with all others since our last settlement before you left this, and then you will find that that unfortunate unpunctuality was not entirely owing to me, and I trust that for the past, present and to come and you will find me not an unfaithful steward. I do not recollect whether in a letter sent by Copenhagen I mention my father’s having made a will some short time before he died, which was kept a profound secret from me till afterwards. The worthy Counsellor was the person who had it drawn. I am left £8,000 on the particular condition that I should not hinder or prevent the other bequests, which were £1,500 to Mrs Harrington and to the boys, £500 to Parson Dudley. But this you know is all fudge. The rental of the estate at present is but £1,600. You see, you must therefore live with prudence and economy for only two years, then I will engage, if you will be guided by me, to increase it £1,200 per annum, and every tenant who lives on the estate have their land cheaper that what they now pay for it to those beasts, middlemen, who have always been the destruction of this country (perhaps you would hardly believe that Richards has set Ballyvoane at 20 shillings and 6 pence an acre all round-your rent is 4 shillings and 3 pence- and the man he has set it to has set the greater part of it for 30 and the remainder of it for what he pays himself, 2 shillings and 6 pence(sic). In what a state must these wretched under-tenants be, you can very well imagine. In such a case as this (and there are many such on your estate) it is a duty you owe your tenantry and yourself to break such leases. Dear Caesar, you must be landlord of your own estate, and suffer no one to intervene between you and your tenants. You can then serve them: at present you cannot. As these were always your sentiments, and I believe you have not changed them, I hope you will not be displeased at my having led off the dance with Mr Richards, having served him with ejectment prior to the receipt of your letters. I am sure he will bring it to a trial next Assizes, when there is not a shadow of doubt of your succeeding, and he is cast, I think all the rest will submit at discretion. So that if I had said one, instead two years, I don’t think I would have been much out. This one farm will rise your rent roll £200 per annum and abate the rent £60 per annum to the under - tenants by which means 15 or 20 poor families will be able to live in comfort. The other farms that are to increase £1,200 are circumstanced exactly similar, and you must allow it would be unreasonable not to punish those rascals whose carriages have been so long oiled with the sweat of your poor tenantry, and therefore, my dear Caesar, you must not prevent me from finishing the task I have began, and for God’s sake, don’t let a word of your dislike to law escape you. If it did, you would be involved in litigation all your life. Leave these matters to my management. You shall have no trouble, nothing to do but re-set your lands. I will attend terms and see everything done right. All I ask is for you not to hinder me, and that you leave the conducting of the business to me; and therefore when there are applications made to you (of which there will be millions) both for your lands and law business, you will refer them to me. I will take all on my back. You know you are unacquainted with the situations of your affairs, and let them apply to me, which is I think a much better answer than Uncle Corneys, ”I’ll consider of it”. Now as I have already engage in less that 2 years to increase your income to £1,200, so I will now engage the same conditions that you never shall be involve in any law suit in which you will not succeed. You may think I speak with too much confidence, but you will find I do not... There can be no rent received out of the estate till after next Easter term, when there will be an agent appointed by the Court of Chancery, to which my mother and I applied for that purpose last November. This is much better than an agent of your appointment to act, because your agent’s receiving would confirm leases, etc, etc. The Chancery you are in no way answerable for. The rents I can hand over to you... ‘ He urges Caesar Colclough to stay away and leave everything to him, and on no account to trust anything to Harvey. John Colclough is also to be watched carefully, for though a good fellow he now has nearly as good an income as Caesar Colclough himself. John Colclough (the writer of the letter) has given a small sum of money to Mrs Harrington, to keep the boys and her from want, and will continue to do so unless Caesar Colclough countermands the order.