Kennedy Colclough interactions.
Copied from Original
document from Bernard Colclough of Waterford (my uncle JC) private collection.
June 1785, County of Wexford.
Whereas it appears by a Constat of An Inquisition returned
into this Court from his Majesty's Court of Common Pleas taken before Sir
Edward Loftus Bart. of the said County at Moneyhore in the said County the 14th
day of June 1784 that Sir Vesey Colclough of Tintern Abbey in the County of
Wexford Bart. was on the 10th Day of May in the 21st year of his present
majesty's reign outlawed in the City of Dublin in a plea of debt at the suit of
John Kennedy on which day the said Sir Vesey Colclough was seized and possessed
as his Estate in fee of and in the towns and lands of Scraughmore, Ryland,
Kearn otherwise Keamtigue, Scahana, Ballylusk, Mangan, demesne of Tintern,
Coolacarney, Kyle, Glaslacan, Coolree, Glebe of Taghmon, Castletown,
Chapaelanane, Newtown, Priestown, and rent charged on Killoughrom, all which
said land are situated lying and being in said County of Wexford and which said
lands are of the yearly value of five pounds sterling in all profits beyond
reprisals, which into his majesty hands the said Sheriff had taken and seized.
Now upon motion of Mr. B. Thomas, Attorney on behalf of the said John Kennedy,
moving on the said constat and praying that a Custodium of the said premises
may be granted to the said John Kennedy, the said Sir Vesey Colclough being
outlawed at his suit as aforesaid, whereupon and on reading the said constat,
it is this day ordered whereupon by the Court that the Clerk of the Pipe do
make out a Custodium of the said Premises to the said John Kennedy to continue
during his Majesty's pleasure at the yearly rent of 5d over and above the
yearly rent and arrears payable thereout to his majesty and that the chief
remembrancer do issue an Injunction for putting the said John Kennedy or his
assigns into the actual and quite possession of said premises whereof all
officers and persons concerned are to take notice.
A true copy W.A.Hutchinson
Kennedy against
Colclough, Duplicate of Custodian,
Copy order dated 15th June 1785.
27 August 1792
Caesar Colclough, Paris to John Colclough, Wexford about the
present state of the Revolutionary Wars and about his financial affairs.
‘I now begin to fear for the liberty of these people, as the
combined armies have taken several towns on the frontiers and are marching
towards Paris, which now begins to dread their approach and many who can quit
it will, but there is at present no possibility of doing that, as all the posts
are guarded, and no one suffered outside of the barriers.
When the conspirators shall all be taken, then the passports
will be returned, and then I intend going to Rouen in Normandy, ready to pass
into England in case any fracas should take place between England and France.
There is at present no likelihood of such, but if by accident or design
anything should happen to the royal family here, I fear George will contrive to
join in the general suppression of liberty. Some thing is wanting much here.
Really, there is too much licentiousness(?).
Have you received Kennedy’s note which I enclosed to you
from London. You never mentioned one word of it. £34 would be too serious a
loss not to merit of its caution. Have you received my money from John
Colclough, and did not Rowe pay you the year’s annuity. (Sentence underlined
for purpose of the subsequent lawsuit.) Send as much as you can to London, as I
am sure of it there, and can have it from that, be where I may (?). Should I be
obliged to quit this, it will cost me a great deal, and oblige me to sell my
things at a great loss. Remember me to my mother and all my friends.’
23 November 1795
John Colclough to Caesar Colclough, Lausanne, reporting that the lawsuit against Richards
has again unexpectedly gone against them, but the suit against Kennedy has gone
in their favour, in spite of the fact that the jury which tried both was
composed of virtually the same people.
The success in the Kennedy suit was in large measure due to the fact
that one of the jurors was a relation of Peter Burrows. John Colclough is now engaged in buying out
the leasehold interest possessed by his name sake (not Uncle) John Colclough,
who is ’the only one of the name’ who deserves any consideration from, and whom
therefore he does not want to deal harshly with. He goes on to give an
unflattering picture of the professional ability of (Jonah) Barrington. ‘... Keogh is a great rascal. He does nothing
but exclaim against us for bringing the ejectments. John Colclough was going to kick him. Only think at the trials of his fixing
himself up by the judge, and whenever there was anything he thought that made
against us, he would say to the judge, ”That is very strong, my Lord”. This is
all because we did not employ Barrington, and the reason why I did not employ
him is that although our house was always open to him, and we paid him every
compliment in our power, he never had the manners, as often as I have been in
Dublin for months together these four years past, either to call or ask me to
eat a bit in his house. In truth, I was glad of an excuse not to employ him,
for he is the stupidest man in Ireland.’
Letter from Caesar of Tintern to John Kennedy, 15th June
1840.
Strictly
Confidential, P.S.
Finding I had time to spare ‘ere this can be put into the
office, and finding I had subject matter to continue, I have made an extract of
Mr. Goff’s half yearly accounts, so far as regards the expenditures of
improvements he says cost him so much, and also the credits on his part for the
dilapidation of my woods, as if money, money, money was wanting for my
gratification. But nothing can
compensate for destroying my mother's Serpentine Walk. I was but 6 years old
when the 12 trees now alluded to, were by her planted, my brother 10 months
younger (now 69 years ago) and the last we knew of parental care, my father
abandoned us all, went off in his Yacht, took up with a Welsh girl, Betty
Watson, in Haverford West, and abandoned himself to dissolute habits, leaving
my mother, self, and brother dependent on my grandfather Grogan for existence,
yet, the trees my mother planted were the only produce of his vast estates he
respected. My brother, to the day of his
death added to and cherished them, Burrows and McCord embezzled 36 thousand
pounds of my revenues (from the 9th of June 1803 to the 26th of July 1841) and
sent me £500 British- they still respected my trees. It remained to J Goff
Esquire J. P. District Governor to make my 75th year the saddest of all my adventurous
career, but as you say-what is done cannot be undone.
In haste yours etc.,
Sir Jonah Barrington in his description of the seven
Baronets of the House of Commons, amongst whom he includes Sir Vesey, thus
alludes to him: “Sir Vesey Colclough, member for County Wexford, who understood
books and wine better than any of the party had all of his days treated money
so extremely ill that it would continue no longer in his service, and the
dross, as he termed it, having entirely forsaken him, he bequeathed an immense
landed property during his life, to the uses of custodiums, elegits, and
judgments, which never fail to place a gentlemen's acres under the special
guardianship of the attorneys. Sir Vesey added much to the pleasantry of the
party, by occasionally forcing on them deep subjects of literature, of which
few of his companions could make either head or tail, but to avoid the imputation
of ignorance they often gave the most ludicrous proofs of it on literary
subjects geography and Astronomy, with which he eternally bored them,”
Sir Vesey was neither Knight nor Baronet, and I am not
certain which title he assumed, but he maintained to the last that he was Sir
Vesey Colclough, challenged everyone who question it, and fought several duels
on that score, but as will be seen by the pedigree he was descended, as I am
(Beauchamp Henry Dudley Colclough, Lieut. Col. in the Wexford Militia born at
Drummondville, Lower Canada, 9th April 1822 who is now (was then) the lineal
Heir Male and representative of Sir Anthony Colclough, and through him of
Richard Colclough of Staffordshire, living 40 Edward III (1367).), from a
younger brother of the first Baronet of the family. Sir Vesey’s eldest son
Caesar, (now known as the Testator) and who succeeded him,
had gone to France at an early age to avoid joining his father in opening the
entail. He was a Detainee there at the time of his father's death, and for many
years afterwards, and the younger son John undertook the management of the
Estates, and the recovery of such parts as could be recovered. His father’s
apartments in the castle having become uninhabitable, he fitted up rooms for
himself at the western, or entrance end of the abbey, which were afterwards
added to by the agents, Mr. Goff and Mr Kennedy, and latterly by Mr.
Rossborough Colclough and which formed the dwelling place of the family. John
repaired the old monks dam, and built a flouring mill, and a high wall around
the garden, planted trees, to replace the timber cut down and sold by Sir
Vesey's orders, roofed and repaired the Crypt which had been formerly the
passage from the Abbots House to the Church, and endeavoured as much as was in
his power to make the place a fit residence for a gentleman. He also entered
into partnership with a bank in New Ross and sought to retrieve the fortunes of
the house in every way, but his law expenses in the different suits brought to
recover parts of the property that had been made away with by his father, and
in which he was only partially successful, and the expenses of contested
elections, kept his financial affairs always at a low ebb. He was member for
the County for many years, and finally lost his life in an election duel with
Mr. William Alcock of Wilton in 1807.
This duel and the death of John Colclough, with the
continued absence of Caesar in France left the estate being run by agents, one
of which was a Kennedy, a large sum of money it was said became unaccounted for but no
proof perhaps of guilt. The persisting idea was that the subsequent impressive American
journey of the Kennedy’s was linked to Caesar Colclough, James Kennedy being dismissed
by Jane (Kirwan) Colclough the above Caesar’s wife. But the machinations of
those days would form the basis of a PhD study in itself.
Onto a place name my dad would have known.
Killanne, Co. Wexford was the place where my dad would have
spent some of his formative years, sent away from the town due to illness, off
to his cousins in the countryside. There are still strong connections there. I’ve
been there a few times, looking at graveyards! One time nearly, 30years ago, I went, I asked about my
dad, I even went up to the farmstead where the Colclough’s were, no one was home
though. I think word got to them there was a stranger about asking about
Colclough’s (I would have said I wasn’t after anything, just to speak about my
dad). Land is precious it seems. All sold now I think.
Photo below was taken by Bernie circa 1996, a few years after I called. Typical farmhouse of the 19th century. Sold stone walls, probably damp but generations of my family would have been there.
Photo below was taken by Bernie circa 1996, a few years after I called. Typical farmhouse of the 19th century. Sold stone walls, probably damp but generations of my family would have been there.